There's at least 5 that I can see from a quick glance of the wikipedia list: * Audi RS3 (7:35.522) * Porsche Cayenne Turbo GT (7:33.95, also an SUV) * Alfa R

There's at least 5 that I can see from a quick glance of the wikipedia list: * Audi RS3 (7:35.522) * Porsche Cayenne Turbo GT (7:33.95, also an SUV) * Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio (7:32) * Porsche Panamera Turbo (7:29.81) * Mercedes-AMG GT 4-Door Coupé 63 S 4MATIC+ (7:25.41) It's actually hilarious to me that you would rather double down and act like a tantruming toddler instead of taking 1 minute to read the list like I did. You're a loser clamoring to defend Tesla with any excuse possible, to the point of desperately lying. I would also wager that if it was actually tested independently the performance would not hold up to what Tesla claims, and that the M5 below it would probably exceed it's time. We already know Tesla lied egregiously about the 0-60 time as no independent test has managed to get below 2.27s without a glued surface and drag slicks. It's also extremely embarassing that the S Plaid cannot beat the times of the Camaro, C6, C7 and C8 corvettes, and R35 GTR. These cars all were less than $80k USD new, while an S Plaid is $148k USD.