7 ms·
We are using Confluence for public and internal wiki, it has a bad search and really slow, but no matter how much everyone hates it, the market does not provide
by dmpanch 5y ago
We are using Confluence for public and internal wiki, it has a bad search and really slow, but no matter how much everyone hates it, the market does not provide worthy alternatives.
When choosing 3 years ago, we used the following criteria:
* WYSIWYG editor. Any user must have a minimum effort to write documentation
* Flexible access permissions to various parts of the documentation. Public documentation is open to anonymous users, the internal one is divided into many sections with access for certain groups
* Multilingual support. Not out of the box, but possible with plugins
* Multilingual pdf export. In some markets, some customers prefer to have exported manuals
* The ability to inherit articles. We need to be able to make edits once, instead of duplicating the same articles
* Have a relatively modern appearance. Wiki engines are familiar to many because the whole world uses Wikipedia, but this does not make them more pleasing to the eyes, if I can say so
3 years have passed, I periodically look at alternatives, so far only wiki.js seems like a good solution but it’s not even close yet.
- jfrunyon 5y ago> the market does not provide worthy alternatives. MediaWiki?