6 ms·
It would be cool to see a version of rlwrap [1] (blwrap in this case?) using this library. [1]: https://man.archlinux.org/man/rlwrap.1 https://man.archlinux.or
by maddyboo 5y ago
It would be cool to see a version of rlwrap [1] (blwrap in this case?) using this library.
[1]: https://man.archlinux.org/man/rlwrap.1 https://man.archlinux.org/man/rlwrap.1
- hanslub42 5y agoWhat advantages would a blwrap have over rlwrap? As I understand it, bestline's advantages over readline (fewer dependencies, license) only apply when you are using it as a library. rlwrap is a separate program that weighs in at around 200k. That could only ever be a problem on an embedded system, where rlwrap/blwrap wouldn't make sense anyway.