6 ms·

It’s noteworthy because it’s bizarre behavior and he’s related to her. The question is how noteworthy. I tend to doubt there’s any sinister plot afoot here, or

It’s noteworthy because it’s bizarre behavior and he’s related to her. The question is how noteworthy. I tend to doubt there’s any sinister plot afoot here, or that it’ll have any impact on the trial. He probably wanted to attend the trial, knows she’s toxic, and was worried that any association with her might affect his businesses. But yeah, I think her father-in-law appearing at the trial in a flimsy disguise and giving ham-fistedly evasive responses is definitely worth a mention, even if it’s not legally actionable or related to the trial itself.

Brian_K_White 5y ago
"It’s noteworthy because it’s bizarre behavior and he’s related to her." It's not noteworthy because it's bizarre behavior. It is specifically relevant behavior. This entire case is only about determining if she is guilty of engaging in exactly this behavior. We should all thank the guy for providing such a great example of why not to believe any story her and her lawyers cook up.