4 ms·
They used to call keeping your personal life separate from work "being professional". Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong here... don't most companies hire peo
by tommymachine 5y ago
They used to call keeping your personal life separate from work "being professional". Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong here... don't most companies hire people to do a job, not to flaunt who they are in their private lives in a distracting manner?
- foldr 5y agoYes. I am so sick of hearing straight people talking about their spouses and children in a professional context. Political correctness has reached such extremes that we were expected to make contributions to a gift for one of my straight colleagues after he announced to the whole team that his opposite sex partner was pregnant. I really wish people would keep their sexual predilections to themselves.
- tommymachine 5y agoIs that because you find it irritating that sex can mean something beyond erotic pleasure for straight people (i.e. procreation)?
- foldr 5y agoSorry, I thought the sarcasm would be obvious. I’m not irritated by my straight colleagues talking about their families. You, however, seem to have a problem with your gay colleagues talking about theirs. As a side note, quite a lot of straight people are irritated by the fact that straight sex can mean more than just erotic pleasure (hence the popularity of contraception).
- tommymachine 5y agoIn most workplaces, sexual eroticism of any kind is an inappropriate topic. I don't have any gay colleagues. To your last point, I would also point out the popularity of "abortion", and say that degeneracy takes many forms.
- foldr 5y agoYou seem to find gay relationships more erotic then most actual gay people do :)
- cto_of_antifa 5y agoyour use of the word degeneracy is kinda saying the quiet part out loud
- dillondoyle 5y agowow. do you think people of color should somehow separate their skin & culture as to maintain 'professionalism' in the office? you can not 'separate' race just as you can't separate ones gender or sexual orientation. it is simply a fact and truth of that persons existence. the mere existence of us queer people is not flaunting anything. the expression of our true selfs does not 'flaunt' and thinking it's some kind of attack on 'professionalism' is just backwards. my life is not distracting, just as your life is not.
- tommymachine 5y agoPlease, without being racist, tell me, what is a "person of color"?
- dillondoyle 5y agoa non white person.
- tommymachine 5y agoSo in your mind, creating a category of people that excludes only one race, and affording special privileges to that category of people alone is not racist in nature?
- EchoAce 5y agoWait, I think you’re misunderstanding a bit. The culture of professionalism ALREADY inherently represses non-straight people (and allows straight people privilege to be who they want). For example, men suits women dresses. There is no culture of professionalism that I know of that gives the privilege to all people. Like a dress code would be fine if it wasn’t obviously biased towards certain culture standards (in this case, western/white, straight). Edit: to put it another way, professionalism in the case of clothing for example would be more fair if there could be a professional qipao, or professional burka, rather than only a professional western option aka the suit.