11 ms·
Is that not the pattern Apple has followed since the release of the original iPhone? This is an "off" year, the device would have been called the 12S but they s
by danieldk 5y ago
Is that not the pattern Apple has followed since the release of the original iPhone? This is an "off" year, the device would have been called the 12S but they stopped that pattern a while back.
This is a mischaracterization of the S models. Even though the non-S models had bigger design changes, the S models were often large technological leaps:
- 4S: single -> dual core
- 5S: first 64-bit iPhone, first Touch ID model
- 6S: twice as much memory, 70% faster CPU than the 6. In contrast to the 6 still supported, probably because it has so much headroom. Also 3D Touch (though it ultimately failed).
- afavour 5y agoIMO it’s not much of a mischaracterisation. Apple has always led with features, not tech specs. New features and designs tended to come one year with performance improvements the next. That feels very much iterative to me.