8 ms·
>You know what this is about. No, nobody does. You keep making vague statements like this without actually saying anything. >I assume you've read the links in
by secuthro22 5y ago
>You know what this is about.
No, nobody does. You keep making vague statements like this without actually saying anything.
>I assume you've read the links in my comment and the tweets
Yea, they just link to more of your own comments stating vague things like "I knew this would happen" (again, without ever saying what "this" is).
If you have concerns, state them. Otherwise this contributes nothing to the discussion.
- yannoninator 5y agoSo you've admitted you haven't read what I said and the tweets and you've just rushed into the comments section? > I don't understand why Google, Microsoft and AWS et. al are on a board of this new foundation. > It is the structure that I am concerned about. Again, I'd rather have them just sponsor Rust, why wasn't a gold or platinum sponsorship like structure considered without placing them on the board of directors. > We shouldn't be giving corporations too much power by letting them buy board seats in a foundation to steer the language, in this case Rust. Are you saying I didn't state these concerns? And even steve is concerned about the structure himself, if you have bothered to read the tweets. Maybe you should actually read my comment and the links before replying.
- secuthro22 5y agoWhat "concerns"? Again you have stated and quoted nothing other than vague "it's the structure" or allusions to "too much power". What about the structure? What power are you alluding to? What are your concerns, exactly? Do you even have any, or are you just being dramatic about "big company bad"?
- yannoninator 5y ago> What are your concerns, exactly? Do you even have any, or are you just being dramatic about "big company bad"? Where did I say "big company bad"?, I'm not against them sponsoring a project, they shouldn't get the opportunity to buy a board seat, which is what Rust's structure allows. Hence why, it's appearing that Rust isn't being led by the community. Before you continue to gaslight me again, you can have companies (big ones) that sponsor a project/foundation and not be given a board seat.
- secuthro22 5y agoYou've replied yet again without actually stating what your concerns are. Lol "gaslighting". Ok.
- yannoninator 5y agoSo you're saying there isn't an issue with the Rust foundation's governance then? Now I'm assuming you just jumped into the comments without understanding anything no? EDIT: > We shouldn't be giving corporations too much power by letting them buy board seats in a foundation to steer the language, in this case Rust. @stale2002 I already mentioned this issue. However the user @secuthro22 continued trolling further with: "WhAT cONCerns?"
- secuthro22 5y agoI wouldn't know. There might be, which is why I've asked you multiple times to explain the issue to me and yet you have neglected to do so.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- CRConrad 5y agoIf you can't understand something on your own, you might be grateful for an explanation, but nobody actually owes you one.
- stale2002 5y agoThe problem is that other people are making vague claims, without actually substantiating them. If someone makes vague claims like that, they deserve to be dismissed. It is on you to state your concerns clearly, not on other people to read between the lines.
- 5y ago