8 ms·
I'm not sure why companies think that restricting usage this way improves their product in any way. You need a different build, and an online account to do some
by bsdubernerd 5y ago
I'm not sure why companies think that restricting usage this way improves their product in any way. You need a different build, and an online account to do something that should require neither.
Heck, I can only partially understand the "click many times over crap" to enable experimental features, which should have been _enough_ to begin with (and certainly not a requirement in a beta build). How many hoops do I need?
After reading this, I was really /hoping/ Fennec would remove the requirement of having a Mozilla account, but no, you still need to create an account and an useless "collection".
TBH I use (and ever used) Firefox just due to the available extensions. The value proposition has decreased quite a bit with recent FF versions, and on Android uBlock is pretty much the only reason I stick to it.
I wish I had more alternatives, because clearly the browser duopoly isn't working.