11 ms·
Because most of my calls are telemarketers and scams, I did this years ago. My message has been for the longest time, "I do not check these messages, please em
by neverywhere 5y ago
Because most of my calls are telemarketers and scams, I did this years ago. My message has been for the longest time, "I do not check these messages, please email me at **@gmail.com"
I would have probably checked my messages more if I had search to text translation of my messages and it wasn't an extra fee.
- happytoexplain 5y agoAnd for the same reasons (spam, "newsletters", etc), I know some people who are abandoning email as well, and instruct people to contact them via a particular chat app or Twitter.
- handrous 5y agoThe best ways to contact me are basically ordered by how many of the messages I receive are automated, whether spam or not. WhatsApp is the best way (0% automated messages), then text (maybe 75-80% automated?), then phone (something like 95-99% automated), then email (~99.99% automated, and that's just the stuff that gets through gmail's spam filters) More machines talking to me = I'm less likely to check messages unless I'm expecting something. If you email me without giving me a heads-up first, there is nearly a 0% chance I'll see it. The only medium where the chance of my actually receiving your message the first try is over 90% is Whatsapp. I used to work to keep the % of garbage down in my email, but realized at some point that I was receiving so few emails I wanted that weren't just transactional messages from a machine, that it was pointless (I can just search for transactional emails if I need them, because I'm expecting them and know where they should be from, so inbox clutter barely affects that use at all).