I like the intro style of the article, but also found some that it glossed over things a bit and added some leading assumptions as a given. "goodput" is not hel

I like the intro style of the article, but also found some that it glossed over things a bit and added some leading assumptions as a given. "goodput" is not helpfully distinguished here, and also explained in a way that is contrary to convention. Throughput is throughput. Goodput is different.