7 ms·
I didn't think typosquatting actually worked. I wonder if there's a general way to figure out the most common misspellings of a given domain name...
by rainsil 5y ago
I didn't think typosquatting actually worked. I wonder if there's a general way to figure out the most common misspellings of a given domain name...
- warent 5y agoOh god, this sounds like it could be an interview question
- MontyCarloHall 5y agoEasier to just do bitsquatting: register all the domains that are one cosmic ray induced bit flip away from a common domain name, e.g. https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/hijacking-traffic-to-microsoft-s-windowscom-with-bitflipping/ https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/hijacking-tra...
- bitexploder 5y agoWe did this for a customer and to see what leaks. It’s very surprising and sometimes very bad from a security perspective on popular and high traffic domains of service providers.
- sbarre 5y agoI remember when this hit HN a few months(?) back, for me it was the first time learning about this and I assumed this might be an obscure thing. I ran the python script against my (very large) employer's domain name and was pleasantly surprised to see we owned all the bitsquatted versions already (there were maybe 10?)
- paulpauper 5y agoit worked for that person because gmail.com is a hugely popular domain and they had gail.com before gmail was even created. nowadays much more competitive
- lhorie 5y agoI recall reading a story about someone who became legendary among squatters because he somehow managed to negotiate the rights to commercialize Colombia's TLD (.co), meaning he positioned himself to take a cut of every .com -> .co typosquat ever. Here's the guy himself talking about it in a NYT article[0] [0] https://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/01/jobs/from-dot-com-to-dot-co.html https://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/01/jobs/from-dot-com-to-dot-...