5 ms·
I think this would be much more appropriate. 15 years in technology is a lifetime. Enforcing a monopoly for so long ensures that there will be no real innovat
by jterce 15y ago
I think this would be much more appropriate.
15 years in technology is a lifetime. Enforcing a monopoly for so long ensures that there will be no real innovation/progress in that area. How can we, as a society, afford to be held back like this?
In so many areas progress would happen much faster if not hindered by legal threat.