5 ms·
Without the (old) extra inconvenience, it would probably be higher than 1%. Also, it could be that this mechanism substitutes for some of the previous anti-thef
by three14 5y ago
Without the (old) extra inconvenience, it would probably be higher than 1%. Also, it could be that this mechanism substitutes for some of the previous anti-theft measures, so it's hard to use the $719,548 figure to conclude anything about whether this would be cost effective.