> C/C++ is used over Ada just for familiar syntax. From a safety perspective, the choice of language is inconsequential. With C/C++ the code analyzers used must

> C/C++ is used over Ada just for familiar syntax. From a safety perspective, the choice of language is inconsequential. With C/C++ the code analyzers used must do more work than with Ada but not that much. That is completely and utterly false despite the millions (billions ?) invested in trying to make sound & safe static analysis tools for C/C++. I know you're trying to push that message but it couldn't be further from the truth. The nature of C & C++ is such that you cannot avoid unsafety, even with very restricted subsets. Disclaimer: I work on Ada tools, but have also worked on C/C++ tools. I have also studied MISRA C and worked on such static analyzers for C & C++.