6 ms·
I've considered this, however: -it's a contractual violation -the work is shoddy -it's immoral -this presents security issues -it would make a good hacker news
by dooberdeats 5y ago
I've considered this, however:
-it's a contractual violation
-the work is shoddy
-it's immoral
-this presents security issues
-it would make a good hacker news story
- slater 5y agothat last part invalidates all the previous parts.
- paulcole 5y agoIf the work is shoddy, fire him — regardless of why it’s shoddy. If you don’t have the power to fire him, convince the people who do. If you can’t do that — on the basis of shoddy work — then it’s time to recalibrate your definition of shoddy.
- znpy 5y agoactually, I just realized that there are some countries whose work laws do not allow firing on the basis of "shoddy work". but would totally allow firing for outsourcing your own job, on the basis of trust violation, trade secrets access from unauthorized people, and stuff like that.
- paulcole 5y agoOut of curiosity, list some of those countries.
- dooberdeats 5y agoGood advice.