5 ms·
In your house example. this is only if the homeowner takes out a loan against the new increased value of the house, and then pays tax on a portion of that loan.
by _archon_ 5y ago
In your house example. this is only if the homeowner takes out a loan against the new increased value of the house, and then pays tax on a portion of that loan. If your house appreciates and you don't play financial games with it, the only increase in costs would come from a local tax reassessment.
- taeric 5y agoI think it is assumed a wealth tax would not require taking out a loan. You can assume that your home would be exempt, but more likely it will just be a standard allowance deductable. This isn't a new thing. Property taxes are the wealth tax that already exists, at large. That is... You're point on a tax reassessment is exactly what is being discussed. And if the tax on your wealth is increased as a form of capital wealth, expect the rates to be higher that most property taxes. Edit: I see I missed that this was a hypothetical on touching collateral. Not sure how I feel on that one. In large because I know so many folks are essentially tricked by marketing to refinance all the time.
- booblik 5y agoSo if you decide to refinance your mortgage that would subject you to a tax? What is wrong with just paying increased property taxes?