You need to realize that there exists the possibility of being both good and bad. Pushing this narrative without considering the obvious facts is a simple mind

You need to realize that there exists the possibility of being both good and bad. Pushing this narrative without considering the obvious facts is a simple minded view. Cheaper products are good for the working class because it means they can afford more products. Automation leads to cheaper products. Common sense. That is the good side of automation for the working class. So the answer is far more complicated then the simpleton answer you came up with here. The more you automate things the cheaper things get but the less jobs are available. The gradient is somewhere in the middle you can't completely have no automation otherwise every product will be custom made and expensive as hell. You can't have 100 percent automation either otherwise there's no one around to have jobs and make money to buy the product. So economically speaking automation is both good and bad for the working class and only a cost benefite analysis can find the right amount automation that is best. There free education for you. A lesson in basic math (see my other replies to your misguided views on quaternions) and economics in one day. I'm not so bold Like you as to run around offering paid consulting work for these trivial lessons.