7 ms·
i think the violation was that technicality that he could not present him self as an engeneer. (no cert)
by nytgop77 5y ago
i think the violation was that technicality that he could not present him self as an engeneer. (no cert)
- cratermoon 5y agoBut he won his case and the court declared that he could say he's an engineer, even though he was not a "licensed professional engineer" according to the Oregon state licensing board.