Here's my complaint. The author is complaining about a big furor over the TOCs, and then proceeds to show us the TOCs that "seems" to be behind it. Here are th

Here's my complaint. The author is complaining about a big furor over the TOCs, and then proceeds to show us the TOCs that "seems" to be behind it. Here are the facts: * Dropbox released new TOCs. * There was a big furor. * Dropbox *modified* the TOCs. * Furor ended. Regardless of whether or not, in your opinion, the TOCs were significantly modified, the fact is that: * The author presents the modified version of the TOCs. * The author claims that the modified version caused the furor. This is patently false.