5 ms·
Just think about what market Google entered in the first place. It was a market with things like altavista.com being the dominant search engines. Facebook was
by j_r_ 15y ago
Just think about what market Google entered in the first place. It was a market with things like altavista.com being the dominant search engines.
Facebook was first, so now it has squatters rights? I don't think so.
- debaserab2 15y agoI feel (and I believe this to be the author's sentiment as well) that Google Plus does not innovate enough on any existing products to grant it significant relevance. Google dominated because it did search much better than it's competitors and got people the search results they were looking for. Google+ does nothing for me that I cannot get with Facebook.
- j_r_ 15y agoWell, it seems to me that the author makes some kind of moral argument out of the whole thing in a David vs. Goliath kind of way. Certainly both are (huge) corporations but I still trust Google more. They still seem to have a sane leadership which I'm not so sure about with Facebook. Maybe I just don't like Zuckerberg ... He just is not the kind of underdog that I would like to succeed. (Edit: Neither is Google, but the author makes it look like Facebook should be support in a way.)
- jase_coop 15y agoI'm neither pro Google or Facebook. I merely make a comparison between the early days, intentions and motives of both Google+ and Facebook, how they're different and why I think that difference is important.