We might be referring to different “second” papers :) https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0031938417304328 https://www.sciencedirect.com/sci

We might be referring to different “second” papers :) https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0031938417304328 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S00319... is about about perceived sweetness https://www.nature.com/articles/s41430-020-00749-6 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41430-020-00749-6 is about glycemic response, which I referred to as the second paper Though it could be argued that both papers were trying to figure out why glucose = bad (the first, testing perceived sweetness, and the second, glycemic response)