5 ms·
To me, it does look like fair use. But I'm not a lawyer. I found this argument pretty compelling, though: http://mrgan.tumblr.com/post/6840184364/hand-pixela
by mccutchen 15y ago
To me, it does look like fair use. But I'm not a lawyer. I found this argument pretty compelling, though:
http://mrgan.tumblr.com/post/6840184364/hand-pixelated http://mrgan.tumblr.com/post/6840184364/hand-pixelated
"That cover is NOT the original photo, downsampled. It’s a hand-crafted, precisely drawn interpretation of the source. Anyone who’s ever seriously put pixels to screen will tell you that this is an actual artistic method, one with its own challenges, tricks, and yes, an aesthetic."
- JonnieCache 15y agoThat is the key point. If painting a version of a photo in oils is allowed, then this is allowed.