10 ms·
It's actually 135px if we're nit picking.
by timerickson 15y ago
It's actually 135px if we're nit picking.
- sunchild 15y agoHa! Must be a browser thing; I actually measured it with xScope.
- ugh 15y agoIt depends on the width of your window. This is a quite common bug that only shows up when the browser window is too narrow. Since their website is incredibly wide (it doesn’t even fit on my 1440px wide screen) it probably shows up for quite a lot of users. My browser window is usually 700px or so wide which is why I encounter that particular bug all the time – especially on otherwise quite nicely designed websites. It absolutely breaks the website and sometimes makes it unreadable (try resizing the window and see what happens), forcing me to resize my browser window. Why don’t web designers like people like me who like to see more than one browser window at a time?
- thaumaturgy 15y agoBecause web design is a horrible abomination suffered by an enthusiastic few and a miserable many; because there is a fundamental, unsolved problem of presenting a specific amount of information (not too much, not too little) to users in a medium which can be radically different from user to user. A design that would look good on your layout would look terrible on another user's widescreen; a design that would look good on a widescreen will look awkward, at best, on your setup. It doesn't help that so many people are still clinging to CSS as the primary answer for this, since it is completely ill-equipped to deal with this problem.