6 ms·

>> but a vast percentage of people are vulnerable to the gradual creep of addiction. > Sorry, you're gonna have to back up this rather hefty statement with som

>> but a vast percentage of people are vulnerable to the gradual creep of addiction. > Sorry, you're gonna have to back up this rather hefty statement with some facts. I've never seen any data to suggest that a "vast percentage" of people are at risk of becoming alcoholics. "vulnerable to the gradual creep of addiction" and "at risk of becoming alcoholics" are not the same thing. A person might refrain from alcohol altogether because they believe, perhaps due to their family history, that if they drank on a regular basis they would become alcoholic. IOW, they feel they are vulnerable to the gradual creep of addiction. And they might be right. But as long they don't drink at all, they're not at risk of developing alcoholism.

CarelessExpert 5y ago
The claim was a "vast percentage of people are vulnerable" to alcoholism. Their reply supports my interpretation of their comment. This isn't about the propensity of an individual to develop alcoholism based on personal circumstances. This is a population-level claim with no data to back it up. Frankly, I'm not even sure what you're arguing but it seems wholly disconnected from the OPs claim or my counterpoint.
- rhapsodic 5y ago
  > The claim was a "vast percentage of people are vulnerable" to alcoholism. Uh, the claim was that "a vast percentage of people are vulnerable to the gradual creep of addiction." As it was written, rather than as you interpreted it, it's a statement that, based on my experience and observations, I believe is correct.