6 ms·

In this case I think tmux replaced screen easily over a year ago.

• joeyh 15y ago
  http://qa.debian.org/popcon-graph.php?packages=screen+tmux&show_installed=on&show_vote=on&show_old=on&show_recent=on&show_nofiles=on&want_legend=on&want_ticks=on&from_date=&to_date=&hlght_date=&date_fmt=%25Y-%25m&beenhere=1 http://qa.debian.org/popcon-graph.php?packages=screen+tmux&#... tmux still has a long hill to climb. FWIW, my .screenrc is 4 lines. My .tmuxrc is 26 lines, and all it tries to do is get a behavior comprable to screen. Ie, using the same ctrl-a, supporting ctrl-ac without needing to release ctrl before the second character, allowing titles to pass thru tmux to the title bar, etc.
  • pyre 15y ago
    > my .screenrc is 4 lines. My .tmuxrc is 26 lines You should see my screenrc. > all it tries to do is get a behavior comprable to screen So, veering from the tmux defaults to change them to the screen defaults takes more work in tmux than in screen? Go figure! I never would have guessed. (Hint: It's easier in screen because they are the defaults) I've never used tmux and I find your post to be biased towards screen. tmux isn't being touted as a 'drop-in replacement' for screen, but that seems to be how you are evaluating it.