7 ms·
Lol ok so there was global warming in 812 for the early bloom or what? Some things just cycle.
by aceon48 5y ago
Lol ok so there was global warming in 812 for the early bloom or what? Some things just cycle.
- aphextron 5y ago>"Some things just cycle." What are local maxima?
- wtallis 5y agoThe article makes it clear that 812 is merely the extent of the historical record-keeping, not that 812 had a remarkably early peak. The article also includes a graph that illustrates no obvious cyclical behavior over that time span.
- throwaway5752 5y agoI'm sorry that you don't understand means, statistical distributions, or standard deviations. Your "gotcha" is a self-own in that regard. Or, by all means show some evidence that the evidence in the linked article (Osaka U publication) is tied to any cycle. I am willing to just look at it with my own lying eyes and see an abrupt trend that begins in the mid-nineteenth century. That visual evidence in addition to the mountains and mountains of data, theory, research and proof behind global warming that agrees with what is plainly obvious are convincing to me.
- yourmom2 5y agoare you one of the "enlightened" american hackers?
- lostcolony 5y agoSo to be clear (some responses imply this, but I figured it's worth calling out) - "since 812" is not saying 812 it was this early. It wasn't. This is the earliest -we've ever recorded-. And the records go back to 812.
- WhompingWindows 5y agoStarting comments with "lol ok" isn't in keeping with HN guidelines, by the way. Some things cycle, and some things trend. Look up the CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere and tell us: is that cycling or is it trending upwards? Look up the temperature in the past 100 years and tell us: is that cycling or trending upwards? Judging based on your "lol ok", you may not be here to advance the dialogue.