5 ms·
Sounds to me they likely don't have children. Even one week at home for my kid is damaging let alone a year. The kids weren't spreading covid to teachers. Teach
by cylinder 5y ago
Sounds to me they likely don't have children. Even one week at home for my kid is damaging let alone a year. The kids weren't spreading covid to teachers. Teachers could have worn respirators and been fine.
Governments should have kept covid out but harming children in this way to make up for disastrous decisions and behaviours of adults is unacceptable.
- foobiter 5y agomy school district couldn’t even promise every classroom has windows that open, so i’m not sure what magical planet teachers are getting respirators on
- quesera 5y ago> Even one week at home for my kid is damaging let alone a year. What do you do during school vacations, and summer?
- antepodius 5y agoThe kid can go outside, go to establishments with friends...
- r00fus 5y agoThen blame the clown politicians who failed to adequately handle the virus in 2020.
- lazyasciiart 5y agoKids should have been going outside throughout the pandemic, and seeing the small group that their family had chosen to isolate with. Of course, most families appear to have chosen to keep their kids inside and not have any isolation partners, which is strange but hardly the fault of the schools.
- blackoil 5y agoYou should figure out why your child's household is so toxic. My son spent about 6 months last year at home. Between daily online classes, video calls with friends/cousins and activities at home. He was missing school/outside but I don't see any lasting negative impact of it.
- cylinder 5y agoyou're an ass. my child is a toddler. they need to be exploring and interacting with other children, in person, playing, learning and receiving stimuli, not locked at home staring at screens.