7 ms·
marjorie taylor green requires more detail than simply “a republican congresswoman” - she’s blamed forest fires on jewish space lasers, among other racist, homo
by foobiter 6y ago
marjorie taylor green requires more detail than simply “a republican congresswoman” - she’s blamed forest fires on jewish space lasers, among other racist, homophobic, and transphobic conspiracy theories
- at_a_remove 6y agoAnd some of the "more detail" might also include that her account was re-instated after that, but that today's suspension comes at a timing that some might consider interesting, as a movement is attempting to oust her from government. Yes, more detail could be invoked.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- ufmace 6y agoIs there like a guide somewhere telling people to bring up some specific incident every time a particular UnPerson's name is brought up? I swear there's a few dozen people for which, as soon as their name is mentioned, a dozen green accounts will suddenly post what somebody has determined is "critical context" under which we are supposed to see them. Okay she made one silly facebook post that doesn't really quite say that. If we're gonna popularize the absurd things said by every freshman congressperson on social media, well we've got a long book to write.
- Jcowell 6y agoWhat? There’s a difference between “one silly post” and the perpetual spiel of QAnon conspiracy theories and beliefs. Your comment makes it seems as if she said that one edgy thing we all say as teenagers in a one off. I don’t agree with muting her until after her expulsion, but this comment is disingenuous.
- foobiter 5y agomaybe i should have brought up the time she shouted at a teenage survivor of a school shooting in public instead of the time she called a fellow representative a member of isis or the time she mocked another representatives transgender child
- rubyist5eva 6y agoShe is still an elected member of congress, and from what I hear - a rather popular one, regardless of her "tinfoil hatery". Opposition parties should _never_ have the power to just expel people they don't like from the opposing side. I'm sure it's purely coincidence she is locked from her twitter account on the same day that congress will be voting on a resolution on whether or not to expel her.
- tobylane 6y ago> Article 1, Section 5, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution addresses the question of what is required to expel a person from Congress. It states: “Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings, punish its Members for disorderly Behavior, and, with the Concurrence of two-thirds, expel a member.” If it’s in the constitution, especially if the founding fathers put it in, it can become popular with Americans.
- kaiju0 6y agoShes has only been removed from twitter for spreading false information. Her free speech has not been violated.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- rubyist5eva 6y agoShe was only only suspended for 12 hours, and Twitter is doing damage control saying it was their automated system that messed up. I don't believe them.
- PartiallyTyped 6y agoFree speech is not concerned with a person's ability to spew and regurgitate bs in private platforms and I see no reason to give her preferential treatment over anyone else.
- andyxor 6y ago