8 ms·

Those are hundreds of instances of people committing perjury.

• thanksforfish 6y ago
  That may be the point https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_disobedience https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_disobedience
  • Cthulhu_ 6y ago
    I don't believe actively sending false claims of copyright infringement can be called 'civil' still. It's going for the offense, instead of passively resisting.
    • mrguyorama 6y ago
      The entire point of civil disobedience is to commit a crime (and usually do the time) in order to raise awareness about the unjustness of said crime
• curryst 6y ago
  Not necessarily. The Constitution requires that all people get equal enforcement of the law. If you can demonstrate that the perjury components are never enforced against companies, you can argue that perjury charges would be unconstitutional selective enforcement. I wouldn't want to be one of the people who have to prove that, though.