5 ms·
> as someone who doesn't anthropomorphize them it's easy to simply not care whatsoever about their emotional state. It doesn't noticeably impact the quality of
by dopidop 6y ago
> as someone who doesn't anthropomorphize them it's easy to simply not care whatsoever about their emotional state. It doesn't noticeably impact the quality of the meat
You haven’t kill much, didn’t you? Otherwise you will know that stress and the way you kill the creature change it’s taste. Depending on what you are killing, it can be a dramatic change.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- core-questions 6y ago> You haven’t kill much, didn’t you? A few things. Mostly fish. Mostly from lack of opportunity. I'm all for humane killing where possible, of course!
- wyre 6y ago>humane killing Please explain how taking away another living, breathing creatures life can be humane.
- dane-pgp 6y agoIs picking a flower or harvesting wheat inhumane? If not, is there something special about the process of breathing that makes animals more worthy of protection than plants?
- fossuser 6y agoI’d argue it’s the presence of neurons, brains, nervous systems that make the difference.
- core-questions 6y agoSure. We can estimate the level of pain caused, and minimize it. That's the definition of humane; it's totally arbitrary and it's up to us to define. Nobody said zero pain or suffering is on the table; it's not like it is an option in our own lives, either.