6 ms·
It shouldn't take 10 lines an hour should it? I don't have experience reviewing professional code of this size, so please correct me if my assumption is wrong,
by maceurt 6y ago
It shouldn't take 10 lines an hour should it? I don't have experience reviewing professional code of this size, so please correct me if my assumption is wrong, but that number doesn't seem right.
- novembermike 6y agoIt really isn't. Most of the code is probably going to be uninteresting and you can do 10 lines a minute or more. Some of the code will be more relevant and might take a day for 10 lines. This would just be checking for accuracy though so you could probably just ignore a huge chunk of it.
- raldi 6y agoI'd say more like ten lines a second, if you're skimming it to look for something. And of course, the work can be parallelized.
- lopatin 6y agoIs this satire?
- bigiain 6y ago"With enough eyeballs, all bugs are shallow^h^h^h^h^h^h buried in the critical open source dependancy underpinning the entire internet maintained by that one guy who's holding down a day job and doing it in his spare time." -- with apologies to Linus (As always, XKCD beat me to this gag: https://xkcd.com/2347/ https://xkcd.com/2347/ )
- raldi 6y agoI'm not sure what you mean. What numbers would you call realistic?
- jjkaczor 6y agoAs part of a quality control team, I personally went through over 1.2 million lines of working code (i.e. not including comments) over the span of about 8 months, M-F, 9am-5pm. So, yeah - this number is bunk.