6 ms·

Thanks, running on self managed clusters or bare metal can save costs in some circumstances, but comes with trade-offs and overheads as well. In our previous co

Thanks, running on self managed clusters or bare metal can save costs in some circumstances, but comes with trade-offs and overheads as well. In our previous company we were managing Kubernetes on bare-metal and what we found was every team started using more and more resources until we ended up with a sprawl of over-provisioned and under-utilized services. We want to support this use case as well by allowing price books to be set up for custom environments so each developer can see a "cost" for these cases as well.

desmap 6y ago
> can save costs in some circumstances [...] and what we found was every team started using more and more resources until we ended up with a sprawl of over-provisioned and under-utilized services This can happen but already for medium deployments the costs are so much lower that you can hire a bunch of devops managing a proper centralized RBAC-based k8s cluster which isn't over-provisioned nor under-utilized. And even if, it should be still significantly cheaper than anything from Google and AWS. But again, if a company runs a strong-margin business model cloud cost optimizations are the wrong thing to think about. Whatever, your solution is definitely a big step in the right direction.