The earlier comment implied that Bannon stole all the monies raised, when in fact, where talking about what - 10%? - diverted? There's no question that 100% of

The earlier comment implied that Bannon stole all the monies raised, when in fact, where talking about what - 10%? - diverted? There's no question that 100% of the monies did not go to the construction of the wall. From a practical standpoint, a non-profit that manages to run with a 10% overhead is very unusual. Most non-profits spend most of their money (70%+) on marketing and administration.