7 ms·
I wouldn’t call ownership a benefit for the 71% of home owners with a mortgage. > Zillow’s Negative Equity 2012 Q3 data; we find 29% (20.6 million) of homeowne
by l3v3ll 6y ago
I wouldn’t call ownership a benefit for the 71% of home owners with a mortgage.
> Zillow’s Negative Equity 2012 Q3 data; we find 29% (20.6 million) of homeowners own their home outright
https://www.zillow.com/research/free-and-clear-american-mortgages-3681/ https://www.zillow.com/research/free-and-clear-american-mort...
- cratermoon 6y agoAt least one Nobel prize-winning economist has noted that home ownership is not all that it's made out to be. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-10-15/the-economist-who-just-won-a-nobel-prize-thinks-owning-a-home-is-a-terrible-investment https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-10-15/the-econo...
- WillPostForFood 6y agoJust flip it around, would plummeting housing prices benefit homeowners with a mortgage? No, that's a disaster (see the 2007 housing crash). Borrowing, especially at the extreme low rates, on an appreciating asset is great, paying debt on a depreciating asset is a nightmare.
- l3v3ll 6y agoFlip what around? A mortgage doesn’t give you the benefits of being wealthy. Whether the market is good or bad. Anyway, the point is moot as the parent report shows the top 10% also own 41% of the houses, so the initial argument stands that the wealthy are benefiting the most.