> I don't understand why these people think this doesn't belong here. Sorry, I wasn't trying to be rude. I just feel like its a couple of paragraphs long and d

> I don't understand why these people think this doesn't belong here. Sorry, I wasn't trying to be rude. I just feel like its a couple of paragraphs long and doesn't have any substance. Like the other guy said, its a fluff piece. And the one thing you specifically pointed out of the article is actually incorrect. >> because the software is so light on >> bureaucracy, it is easy to customize and >> to contribute to. > Would someone care to refute this? I would. Emacs was specifically NOT light on bureaucracy. That is specifically why xemacs created. Anyway, hope you have a good day.