5 ms·
There are no legit/mainstream sites anymore, there are too many powerful political interests in play. What tries to pass for "legit/mainstream" these days is p
by JuliusPullo 6y ago
There are no legit/mainstream sites anymore, there are too many powerful political interests in play. What tries to pass for "legit/mainstream" these days is plain old propaganda. Thedonald.win itself exists because the original group, r/The_Donald, was censored and banned from reddit on the excuse that they were inciting violence against the police. This, of course, happened just before inciting violence against the police was considered cool. If you want to know what that other side thinks (supposing you are on the other's other side), go to thedonald.win.
- giantg2 6y agoI guess what I'm saying is that if you use a single site to stereotype a group of people, that stereotype will be wildly inaccurate. I'm sure there are Trump supporters (maybe better phrased as non-Biden supporters) that don't believe half the stuff on that site.
- redflame8 6y agoThere’s over 1 1/2 million people on that site it’s the largest forum of Trump supporters by far
- giantg2 6y agoSo 1.5M out of the 70M+ that voted for him...
- redflame8 6y agoYes that is how math works. where do I find that portion of Biden supporters in one place?
- giantg2 6y ago"Your mother was a hamster and your father smelt of elderberries!" Quit being a troll. Do you have a source for your 1.5 million claim? I could cite democraticunderground.com (260k) as a Biden supporting website. I guess I could stereotype all 70+M who voted for him as socialist terrorists because I see threads like "Do you ever dream of blowing up a trump building?". This sort of stereotyping based on a homogeneous sample of a fringe/clique website is wrong. Anyone with a basic understanding of statistics would know that taking a sample from a website like these would be biased.
- redflame8 6y agoTriggered.