27 ms·

I’d say that the reviews you have cited are satirical.

• lifepillar 6y ago
  I retract my assessment. I have found what appears to be the original paper ([0], from Computer 2005), and there is no indication that the reviews are fake. On the contrary, it appears that they are brought up as striking examples of a reviewer's incompetence. Wow! [0] https://wp.doc.ic.ac.uk/cairesfe/wp-content/uploads/sites/80/2014/12/reject.pdf https://wp.doc.ic.ac.uk/cairesfe/wp-content/uploads/sites/80...
  • lifepillar 6y ago
    Ok, I've read everything more carefully: those are clearly hypothetical, entertaining reviews. Hints: (1) the link at the beginning; (2) no references to the sources :-)
    • dwenzek 6y ago
      Thank you. This is the article I remember. And yes, I have been fooled. This is a lesson to only cite (and even remember) carefully read articles!