8 ms·
I don't know in what context they could use Geek in 1800. http://ngrams.googlelabs.com/graph?content=geek&year_start=1800&year_end=2000&corpus=0&smoothing=3 htt
by iunk 15y ago
I don't know in what context they could use Geek in 1800.
http://ngrams.googlelabs.com/graph?content=geek&year_start=1800&year_end=2000&corpus=0&smoothing=3 http://ngrams.googlelabs.com/graph?content=geek&year_sta...
- Groxx 15y agoOr the 1700s: http://ngrams.googlelabs.com/graph?content=geek&year_start=1000&year_end=2000&corpus=0&smoothing=3 http://ngrams.googlelabs.com/graph?content=geek&year_sta... Perhaps weirder, "Woot": http://ngrams.googlelabs.com/graph?content=Woot&year_start=1500&year_end=2000&corpus=0&smoothing=3 http://ngrams.googlelabs.com/graph?content=Woot&year_sta...
- iunk 15y agoSeems like some are incorrect when i look at the scanned pages and one of those says Geck instead of Geek http://books.google.com/books?id=gvYqAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA497&dq=geek&hl=en&ei=z2e4TZ_sNaPY0QGy8JT1Bw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&sqi=2&ved=0CDsQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=geek&f=false http://books.google.com/books?id=gvYqAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA497&#...
- Groxx 15y agoAh, good point. This is generated by OCR + reCAPTCHA, error is guaranteed to creep in.