5 ms·
I think I understand your point. It's more back to the mainframe model of software development. I did this back in the 90s and I never had to think about scali
by treespace89 6y ago
I think I understand your point.
It's more back to the mainframe model of software development. I did this back in the 90s and I never had to think about scaling. Granted these were just simple crud / back-office apps.
But I can see how it would work for most modern software.
- gnarcoregrizz 6y agoThe mainframe model is viable (and legitimate) again because you can buy 128 core machines. That’ll have no problem running at people’s businesses