4 ms·
It sounds like the original analogy is apt, and your followup analogy isn't.
by throwaway373438 6y ago
It sounds like the original analogy is apt, and your followup analogy isn't.
- mehrdadn 6y agoI wasn't the one who compared this with the width of a car and then got confused what a shorter width would even mean. But sure, if you say so.
- throwaway373438 6y agoProgram identifiers use exact matches. The analogy works fine understanding this context. It's possible to extend any analogy in a way that doesn't make sense, which is what you've done. It seems like your complaint may be that you simply don't like, or perhaps don't understand, analogies in general.