Don't buy it if your only reason for doing so is 'buzz.' Have you considered trying out a "Hackintosh"-type setup first? If that doesn't work for you, you cou

Don't buy it if your only reason for doing so is 'buzz.' Have you considered trying out a "Hackintosh"-type setup first? If that doesn't work for you, you could still sell the PC easily and then buy a Mac. I make very good money in the US, and I still took several weeks to talk myself into buying a new Macbook Pro to replace an '05 Powerbook (in part because I already have a 27" iMac as my main computer.) Apples are expensive. To me, it is the software that makes them a great value, though. If you bought the MBP, would you still have the funds to spend on software and to complete your freelance/startup work without major sacrifices? I think it is ridiculous to ask a question like this on HN since we don't really know your financial circumstances. Are you really just wanting us to help rationalize a decision you've already made? ;-) [And now...my first HN cross-post ever:] RE: Fusion vs. Parallels I just bought a new MB Pro and am getting ready to install Parallels on it for the first time. I've always used Fusion on my Macs (to triple-boot with Win and Linux) in the past. I thought Parallels was currently the leader in the shootouts regarding speed/features? Anyone keep up to date with their VM horse race or have a good reason to use one over the other? I already have licenses for both. Thanks.