5 ms·
That's funny, I was expecting the opposite behavior: fart => [ :fart ] fart 1 => [ :fart, 1 ] fart 1, 2 => [ :fart, 1, 2 ] Seems more lispy to me,
by dustmop 15y ago
That's funny, I was expecting the opposite behavior:
fart => [ :fart ]
fart 1 => [ :fart, 1 ]
fart 1, 2 => [ :fart, 1, 2 ]
Seems more lispy to me, and from a quick glance I can't see where it would break.
- zwp 15y agoYes, I prefer this, definitely more lispy. I blame seeing too much of clojure's "defn fart [ args ]" syntax ;-)