> The researchers expected that the best programmer would outperform his average counterpart by a factor of two or three. But it turned out that the most skille

> The researchers expected that the best programmer would outperform his average counterpart by a factor of two or three. But it turned out that the most skilled programmer far outperformed the worst. He was 20 times faster at coding, 25 times faster at debugging, and 10 times faster at program execution than the programmer with the lowest marks. What? Okay, so how much did he outperform the average one?