5 ms·I saw a version of this dating back to 1997, so that's why it probably seems old.by mcknz 6y agoI saw a version of this dating back to 1997, so that's why it probably seems old.mttjj 6y agoThe second to last paragraph states that the author gave a version of the document as a talk at a conference in 1997. So it appears that your memory is spot-on.endgame 6y agoI remember seeing it in the early 2000's, so yeah.