6 ms·
A draft of the SPDY specification is here: http://dev.chromium.org/spdy http://dev.chromium.org/spdy Mike Belshe presented about SPDY in the IETF HTTP working
by hk9565 15y ago
A draft of the SPDY specification is here:
http://dev.chromium.org/spdy http://dev.chromium.org/spdy
Mike Belshe presented about SPDY in the IETF HTTP working group meeting at the most recent IETF meeting:
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/80/slides/httpbis-7.pdf http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/80/slides/httpbis-7.pdf
We'd love for more folks to implement SPDY, both clients and servers.
- beza1e1 15y agoSounds like HTTP 1.2? Since Google servers and Chrome already support it, the chicken-egg problem might be solved. Firefox has an incentive to implement it to make Google search faster and other web service should implement this to provide a smoother user experience.
- silvestrov 15y agoHTTP 2.0 (1.2 would have to be backwards compatible)
- Seth_Kriticos 15y agoYes. And just to argument this, here is the relevant except of the FAQ: Q: Is SPDY a replacement for HTTP? A: No. SPDY replaces some parts of HTTP, but mostly augments it. At the highest level of the application layer, the request-response protocol remains the same. SPDY still uses HTTP methods, headers, and other semantics. But SPDY overrides other parts of the protocol, such as connection management and data transfer formats.
- powertower 15y agoBroken link above. Try this one: http://tools.ietf.org/agenda/80/slides/httpbis-7.pdf http://tools.ietf.org/agenda/80/slides/httpbis-7.pdf