7 ms·
I think the idea that scientific code should be judged by the same standards as production code is a bit unfair. The point when the code works the first time is
by magv 6y ago
I think the idea that scientific code should be judged by the
same standards as production code is a bit unfair. The point when
the code works the first time is when an industry programmer
starts to refactor it -- because he expects to use and work on
it in the future. The point when the code works the first time
is when a scientists abandons it -- because it has fulfilled its
purpose. This is why the quality is lower: lots of scientific
code is the first iteration that never got a second.
(Of course, not all scientific code is discardable, large quantities
of reusable code is reused every day; we have many frameworks,
and the code quality of those is completely different).
- dunefox 6y agoThat's not the point, though. If you obtain your results by writing and executing code then code quality matters - to reproduce and validate them.