6 ms·
You've got it completely backwards. Invert your questions: What cookies shouldn't be deleted, and why shouldn't they be deleted? The continued existence o
by catalogia 6y ago
You've got it completely backwards. Invert your questions: What cookies shouldn't be deleted, and why shouldn't they be deleted? The continued existence of a cookie requires justification, not the deletion of a cookie. Only a small minority of cookies exist for the users' benefit.
- jimmaswell 6y agoI don't personally care if some ad network made a few pennies off me, and preventing that wouldn't be worth the inconvenience to me.
- catalogia 6y agoDisable it then, just because you're apathetic to such matters doesn't mean the application should assume everybody is. >inconvenience It's seriously doubtful you or any other user will notice any negative ramifications from third party cookies being deleted, because there basically are none.
- jimmaswell 6y agoWe'll notice the inconvenience when more services get paywalled due to not being able to make enough ad money.
- weikju 6y agothen they should show ads without all the tracking...
- heavyset_go 6y agoWell, it certainly seems like you care, so which is it? Do you care or not care?
- jimmaswell 6y agoApathetic to cookies or being tracked, care about free services. Not really complicated.