5 ms·
JANUS looks great on paper, but is pretty restrictive for doing anything useful in real life. At the standard frequency bands they've chosen (9440-13600 Hz), w
by notthetup 6y ago
JANUS looks great on paper, but is pretty restrictive for doing anything useful in real life.
At the standard frequency bands they've chosen (9440-13600 Hz), with the type of coding scheme they use FH-BFSK, the bandwidth is too limited (4KHz -> ) to do anything except service discovery.
Having said that, I agree, it should have been mentioned.
- throw0101a 6y ago> JANUS looks great on paper, but is pretty restrictive for doing anything useful in real life. Were they going for reliability rather than bandwidth? Are there any alternative 'underwater modem/codec' standards?