5 ms·
> decidedly not weird architecture and a very well known operating system Can you say which ones? It's hard to place your comment without details.
by hellofunk 6y ago
> decidedly not weird architecture and a very well known operating system
Can you say which ones? It's hard to place your comment without details.
- tomstuart 6y agoThe context implies it’s macOS on Apple silicon.
- qalmakka 6y agoIn that case the comment makes no sense - the details of AArch64-based Macs have been made public just a few weeks ago. It takes a while to do port and test for a new platform, even if iOS was already supported.
- jpace121 6y agoIt’s implied the OP isn’t considered part of the “public” for this issue.
- saagarjha 6y agoNo, I learned of it the same time you did, although I had a fairly good idea about when this was coming for a few years ;) And while I have a bit of additional information now, it's nothing that would really be useful for porting.
- officeplant 6y agoUnless they work for apple. Those on the inside have been toying with it for a while now.
- saagarjha 6y agoNope, just a third-party developer who until June knew of "aarch64-darwin-xnu" as "iOS" ;)
- saagarjha 6y agoYup, that’s what I’m doing. Just offering my comments on how difficult some projects are to port: some require no new code and some will require quite a bit, and some will be blocked on their dependencies being in the latter camp :)