Here is what people mean when we say we don't like Section 230. And we mean it whether or not Section 230 is actually responsible. - Advertiser uses our tradem

Here is what people mean when we say we don't like Section 230. And we mean it whether or not Section 230 is actually responsible. - Advertiser uses our trademark on Google Ads? Google makes money and has editorial control. But we can't sue them. - Somebody posts something libelous about us on Twitter? Twitter makes serious money and has editorial control. But we can't sue them. - Fakes on eBay? Can't stop them. eBay not liable. If Twitter is going to have a "fact checking" department, then they also need a "retractions" department. And if retraction aren't forthcoming when reasonable, then we need a cause of action against them.